5 ms·
"going fine" vs "Despite uproar, few seek to use California’s new housing-density law. What’s stopping them?"..."In San Francisco, 14 property owners have appli
by shaburn 4y ago
"going fine" vs "Despite uproar, few seek to use California’s new housing-density law. What’s stopping them?"..."In San Francisco, 14 property owners have applied to build SB9 projects"
https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-housing-density-law-SB9-17295074.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-hous...
- tptacek 4y agoThe very opening of the story you just pasted explains why: because San Francisco charged someone trying to use the law a $98,000 fee.
- happyopossum 4y agoWhich tell’s me it’s not “going fine”…
- astrange 4y agoThe entire YIMBY project is what's going fine. A specific bill about ADUs is nice but not expected to solve everything. It'd be going better if parking minimums and the social housing agency get through.
- whimsicalism 4y agoSunnyvale, not SF. I would be shocked if SF charged that much to deter ADUs.
- shaburn 4y ago