3 ms·
Most incredible thing to me is that this is his main point of contention : >They will MASSIVELY decrease our home values I get that mansions, like SFHs, are s
by BbzzbB 4y ago
Most incredible thing to me is that this is his main point of contention :
>They will MASSIVELY decrease our home values
I get that mansions, like SFHs, are seen as investments. And I suppose this is just how they want to bring locals/voters/officials (who might not be as uber-rich?) on board while muffling the quiet part ("quality of life", i.e. mixing classes). But if it's even a remotely honest sentiment, how damn much is enough? He's a (multi-?)billionaire and still gives two shits about his house's appraisal? So shallow, but I guess in character for someone who just bought a $177M palace ("priciest home sale ever in CA") with the money of retail bagholders.
- pas 4y agonot to mention that it's false. a one acre plot sells for more in the middle of SF than in the middle of richtown. what goes down is the immediate price to rent out if new units become available in the vicinity. what all these NIMBYs want is a reservation for themselves, where time (and gas prices and everything else) is frozen.