3 ms·
That also has not gone well. Check the adoption of SB9.
by shaburn 4y ago
That also has not gone well. Check the adoption of SB9.
- astrange 4y agoIt's going fine. Housing isn't intended to be fixed by a single bill, there's new ones every year and SB9 will be easier to strengthen now that it's actually passed. Some significant legal victories too: https://www.yimbylaw.org/the-general-plan-rules https://www.yimbylaw.org/the-general-plan-rules
- shaburn 4y ago"going fine" vs "Despite uproar, few seek to use California’s new housing-density law. What’s stopping them?"..."In San Francisco, 14 property owners have applied to build SB9 projects" https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-housing-density-law-SB9-17295074.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-hous...
- tptacek 4y agoThe very opening of the story you just pasted explains why: because San Francisco charged someone trying to use the law a $98,000 fee.
- happyopossum 4y agoWhich tell’s me it’s not “going fine”…
- astrange 4y agoThe entire YIMBY project is what's going fine. A specific bill about ADUs is nice but not expected to solve everything. It'd be going better if parking minimums and the social housing agency get through.
- whimsicalism 4y agoSunnyvale, not SF. I would be shocked if SF charged that much to deter ADUs.
- shaburn 4y ago