That much is obvious if you only factor in clean energy without GHG capture (note: capture is also being worked on), but a very slow rise is a whole different c

That much is obvious if you only factor in clean energy without GHG capture (note: capture is also being worked on), but a very slow rise is a whole different climate outcome (and gives us time to figure the rest out for centuries) than the current rise that has a measurable impact well within our lifetime. Put another way, you're gonna die anyhow but most people prefer not to invite it while they can still live healthily. An argument about not being able to stop it completely when we can postpone the worst part by how many centuries (even without already existing capture technology) sounds very weird to me.