3 ms·
From the fact check posted in another comment: > Palumbi added: “Coral cover is actually slightly lower than normal levels in the north, central and southern p
by h0l0cube 4y ago
From the fact check posted in another comment:
> Palumbi added: “Coral cover is actually slightly lower than normal levels in the north, central and southern parts of the huge reef. But coral diversity hasn’t recovered - the increase of cover is due to a set of very fast-growing species. Like a forest of fast-growing trees, not the normal oaks.”
> There are many varieties of coral on the reef, with hard coral cover of huge significance to marine scientists.
> Pointing to a study (here), President of the International Coral Reef Society (coralreefs.org/) Andrea Grottoli, says, “Australia is at record low of hard coral cover (see Ch 2, page 8), most of this decline due to declines on the GBR.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-environment-oceans-idUSL2N2XI1NV https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-environment-oceans...