Visa has not been found guilty of anything in this case yet. The court merely didn't fully grant their motion to dismiss. That only establishes that Visa is ac

Visa has not been found guilty of anything in this case yet. The court merely didn't fully grant their motion to dismiss. That only establishes that Visa is actually being accused of something illegal, i.e. Pornhub allegedly knowingly profiting from child porn and Visa allegedly providing payment services to Pornhub while allegedly knowing that Pornhub was using those payment services to profit from child porn (allegedly) would make Visa a participant in the alleged crime, if those allegiations turn out to be true. Hence Visa is a defendant in the court case where the truth of the allegiations will then be debated. That's why the document you linked uses the word "allegedly" so often.