From the authors original post, it looks like you're right in saying that was not one of his goals. This article says: > Thus we can reasonably say that the c

From the authors original post, it looks like you're right in saying that was not one of his goals. This article says: > Thus we can reasonably say that the code does contain an implementation of a very limited and basic form of LaTeX. Which is what I'm primarily debating. I feel like a basic LaTeX implementation would at least attempt mathematical typesetting, but that could be debated :)