You're right about SESTA-FOSTA being terrible, but I don't think it's the relevant law here. The relevant code here is 1591(a)(2). https://www.law.cornell.edu

You're right about SESTA-FOSTA being terrible, but I don't think it's the relevant law here. The relevant code here is 1591(a)(2). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591 The opinion of the court is that the defendents benefit monetarily from a commercial sex act involving someone below 18 years of age.