3 ms·
IQ is something very narrow. The fact that you can do some symbolic inference on paper does not mean that you will be more successful in life From my school ma
by whatever1 4y ago
IQ is something very narrow. The fact that you can do some symbolic inference on paper does not mean that you will be more successful in life
From my school mates I have seen many of them who had on paper low IQ to have great careers as entrepreneurs, salesmen, athletes, craftsmen. I have also cases with top students who did not go anywhere.
So I am not sure whether an average increase of IQ would help the society.
Literacy for sure helps, but I am not convinced about IQ.
- jlawson 4y agoThis is false: "The fact that you can do some symbolic inference on paper does not mean that you will be more successful in life" IQ, more than any other psychometric measure, predicts a wide variety of positive life outcomes including income, health, longevity, not being incarcerated, etc. Here [0] is a simplistic article about it, but there are endless studies and discussions about this, all with the same clear and uncontroversial result. [0] https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/11/does-iq-determine-success-a-psychologist-weighs-in.html https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/11/does-iq-determine-success-a-... Further reading: [1] https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2019/07/massive-danish-sibling-study-confirms-charles-murrays-findings/ https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2019/07/massive-danish-sibling-... [2] https://www.google.com/search?q=iq+predicts+success https://www.google.com/search?q=iq+predicts+success
- 8note 4y agoIQ correlates quite heavily with practice time on multiple choice tests though. Who spends their time doing lots of tests? Rich kids. Being wealthy also predicts a wide variety of positive life out ones including income, health, longevity, and not being incarcerated
- jlawson 4y agoNo, this issue of test practice being a confounder has been studied exhaustively for decades. There are many ways studies have been designed to determine its impact. For example: Examining the predictive value of IQ tests between siblings in the same household (who generally have the same access to resources). Answer: IQ remains very powerfully predictive even within a household. A century of study and attempts at intervention have all pointed to an overwhelmingly clear result: It's not wealth that makes someone have high IQ. It's high IQ that makes people wealthy. Children do inherit high IQ from their parents who had high IQ, but the mechanism of this isn't through wealth, it's genetic. About 80% of the variance in IQ is by genetic parentage. Example study: Examining adoptees' IQ scores in relation to their genetic parents versus the parents who raised them. Answer: They inherit their measured IQ from their genetic parents; the adoptive parents have essentially no effect (the last 20% of variation is basically random).
- lamp987 4y ago>IQ isnt meaningful because i know counter-examples. That doesnt mean anything.
- whatever1 4y agoWell if you had counterxamples for thermodynamics it would be Nobel worthy news. The fact that everyone has counterxamples for the IQ’s predictive strength from their immediate cycle, shows how reliable of a metric it is.