DALL-E either doesn't generate images you want to see, or if it does, it does a bad job, because it generates many images you don't want to see. In other words

DALL-E either doesn't generate images you want to see, or if it does, it does a bad job, because it generates many images you don't want to see. In other words, the claim you've set up is basically unfalsifiable, given that thre's no way to form strong counterevidence from its outputs. (I would argue that if there was, we'd already have it in the vast majority of outputs that aren't images people want.) If I were to refine what you're saying, is that DALL-E is constrained to generating images that make sense to the human visual system in a coherent way. This constraint is a far cry from what you need to be able to lift it up to claim it is "bullshitting" though, since this constraint is at a very low level in terms of constraining outputs.