My point is, "getting paid by the number of words or paid by the number of stories produced per day" is no longer journalism. Call it reporting. Call it wordsmi

My point is, "getting paid by the number of words or paid by the number of stories produced per day" is no longer journalism. Call it reporting. Call it wordsmith-for-hire. Call it whatever you want. But that is no longer journalism. I certainly understand the nature of that business has changed. However, that doesn't mean they get to be lazy and sloppy and still earn / deserve the title of journalism and journalists, any more than flipping burgers at McDonald's makes me a chef. The fact that they've knowingly and shamelessly changed the meaning of the word (i.e., they use it well aware of the fact that they don't meet the definition) doesn't make it okay. Repeating a lie doesn't magically turn it into truth.