Another example of the frequently touted idea that to show conviction in a problem, you must either support the non-compromising right to do it (ex: 2nd amendme

Another example of the frequently touted idea that to show conviction in a problem, you must either support the non-compromising right to do it (ex: 2nd amendment absolutists), or the non-compromising banning of it (the guy in this article). To be quite frank, this is a very childish way of viewing the world. I get that media companies like Vice portray things in this way because it's an easy way to get views, and therefore makes for a headline that's an easy way to get upvotes. We should aim to be better than this.