I meant more like the democratic party (new york times), republican party (fox), the national security establishment (washington post). This is still too vague

I meant more like the democratic party (new york times), republican party (fox), the national security establishment (washington post). This is still too vague even, I think and there are probably complex sub-centres of power (e.g. factions within the democrats) and alliances (e.g. the neocon/democratic party nexus) reflected as well. All of this gets airbrushed over by the traditional left/right continuum. It's critically important too, coz it definitely drives both what is reported and how it's selectively presented and is a better predictor than an arbitary left/right designation.