6 ms·
That really depends on what “work” means. Categorising people is easy; categorising them correctly in every case requires a very careful definition and an abili
by TazeTSchnitzel 4y ago
That really depends on what “work” means. Categorising people is easy; categorising them correctly in every case requires a very careful definition and an ability to correct mistakes.
- raxxorraxor 4y agoIf there is a law to for example has to regard something sex specific like pregnancy, people have to make peace with the term woman. Even those that think of them not being women for one reason or another. It is assumed to still apply. A significantly more pressing problem of our legislation is its accessibility. Nobody on this planet needs lawyers defining sex. But they would do it and everyone will have to pay for their time. Additionally the laws that differentiate sex should be under scrutiny for discrimination. That includes tax discrimination for people within or outside of any partnerships.
- TazeTSchnitzel 4y ago> Nobody on this planet needs lawyers defining sex. But they would That ship sailed the moment sex gained legal significance, which means in many jurisidictions it has always been a subject lawyers can argue over. It's not going to come up most of the time, but for that 0.1% of the population it has and will. If you don't want lawyers arguing about sex, you would have to get rid of the concept of sex in law, including sex discrimination law.