No one said it’s a magic talisman. But Bayesian probability is far more in line with most peoples intuitive understanding about probability and statistics than

No one said it’s a magic talisman. But Bayesian probability is far more in line with most peoples intuitive understanding about probability and statistics than frequentist probability. There will always be no instances where individuals err in the way they apply statistical methods. But that doesn’t mean that there is no value in moving the “default” in statistics to a more intuitive methodology from one that is so obtuse that it’s common for relatively advanced practitioners to stumble over it