4 ms·
Which is all well and good unless users don't have a choice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_screen_readers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_o
by btucker 15y ago
Which is all well and good unless users don't have a choice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_screen_readers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_screen_readers
- endtwist 15y agoExcept, that's a poor argument: http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey3/#javascript http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey3/#javascript
- ricardobeat 15y agoExcept that most sites don't care about providing decent clues (correct mark-up, ARIA attributes, etc) for javascript interactions, so that's also a poor argument.
- jgroome 15y agoHow many web developers looking up CSS reference material are using screen readers though? It's OK to develop for your target audience, right?
- sedev 15y agoI admit I'm atypical here, but I do all my development work in emacs, and it's nice to have reference material that can also be accessed through emacs.