This makes an interesting low-drama example or case study of a polarizing idea. Everyone here either loves or hates the core idea (the core idea not the detail

This makes an interesting low-drama example or case study of a polarizing idea. Everyone here either loves or hates the core idea (the core idea not the details), but it's a safe difference not religion or guns etc. People on opposite sides merely think the others are crazy or stupid not evil or inhuman. One thing I've observed; Of the people who like the idea, they often have alterations or improvements to suggest to address various facets of it. They say "the idea is good but there is a problem and maybe that can be addressed this way ...". Of the people who don't like it, few/none are criticizing any specific facets or suggesting ways to address them to still get the core ideas' safety benefit, nor explain how the core stated benefit is not needed because you get it some other better way. They only say "god no, why? no way"