At the risk of a no-true-Scotsman argument, I want to point out the difference between Frequentism as practiced by statisticians and non-statisticians. Non-stat

At the risk of a no-true-Scotsman argument, I want to point out the difference between Frequentism as practiced by statisticians and non-statisticians. Non-statisticians will simply say that a result was stat sig, without specifying even the corresponding p-value, let alone an effect size point estimate or confidence interval. I always report confidence intervals front and center, and bring in point estimates and p values as supporting characters. And of course discussing to what extent the study design supports causal conclusions.