I like to use the term "misleading precision" because it's not just frequentism and not just non-statisticians and not just science. That said, every step that

I like to use the term "misleading precision" because it's not just frequentism and not just non-statisticians and not just science. That said, every step that forces everybody to acknowledge uncertainty is good. Given our progress e.g. in getting people to recognize how important power is (e.g. since Cohen, 1992 at the latest), I'm very pessimistic. But while we may not be able to get everyone on board the bayes train, we can at least force people to openly show that they don't care about good statistics.