4 ms·
Instead of asking writers to defend perspectives they aren't strong in, why not just read from multiple sources? Isn't aggregation the modern style of news? Who
by threatofrain 4y ago
Instead of asking writers to defend perspectives they aren't strong in, why not just read from multiple sources? Isn't aggregation the modern style of news? Who reads singular publications nowadays?
Also, away from the topic of credibility, what about coverage of relevant stories? If you're interested in video game news, are you going to wait for the NYT to finally cover your interests as a reader? No outlet can provide adequate coverage for your interests, so you are always going to be missing out on a story that you care about. Thus news products designed to be your one-and-everything are doomed to fail vs modern aggregators that allow you to have inclusionary and exclusionary lists of sources and topics.
- ajsnigrutin 4y agoYou'd expect atleast some decency in such mainstream media, especially in areas where they should be competent at. https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2022/may/17/evacuation-of-azovstal-plant-in-mariupol-in-pictures https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2022/may/17/evacua... This for example, from the title, the word "evacuation" and even the headline image are a clear example of something that a "prestige" newspapar such as The Guardian should never do.