A woman can allege she was sexually assaulted years or decade after the event, and still be presumed to be stating the 'truth'. Yet Adams' claim - of discrimi

A woman can allege she was sexually assaulted years or decade after the event, and still be presumed to be stating the 'truth'. Yet Adams' claim - of discrimination for being white and male - is somehow presumed to be 'different' from the 'truth', just because he "claimed that long after the fact"? The truth does not change depending on the age of a claim.