3 ms·
If not then that just means that both this counterargument against cutesy errors as well as the original rationale to have them in the first place are both equa
by shawnz 4y ago
If not then that just means that both this counterargument against cutesy errors as well as the original rationale to have them in the first place are both equally weak. That's not a point in favour of this argument.
- pseudalopex 4y agoPoints in favor of this argument can be found in other comments.
- shawnz 4y agoOK, sure, but what does that have to do with what I'm saying about usability testing being important to validate your hypotheses?