2 ms·
Couldn't disagree with this article more. What the author is saying is that to be a 10x programmer, you should be building scaffolding all day (instead of actua
by danielrhodes 15y ago
Couldn't disagree with this article more. What the author is saying is that to be a 10x programmer, you should be building scaffolding all day (instead of actually tackling the problem at hand and getting things done). The part about no margin for error is also ridiculous and is the type of thinking that results in aversion to risk rather than a process for dealing with errors.
The reality is that there are different types of coders who are better suited for different types of tasks. When you mismatch a coder to a task they aren't well suited for, results are not great. Some are super fast but there is little regard for how it was created (great for trying out new ideas that need validation), others are more methodical and better for tricky things that need to be done right.
- johnfn 15y agoYour point about scaffolding kind of distorts the point I was trying to make - it's a false dichotomy to say that you either build scaffolding or get things done, and I didn't intend to favor scaffolding over the other. I think your point about error is more valid. When I wrote about errors, I was thinking about more serious errors, but I don't think I wrote that, and I think it changes my argument some.