4 ms·
It's more like debating whether the house meets the definition of a "blaze" or not. We all see the fire, we all have access to the relevant economic indicators
by SantalBlush 4y ago
It's more like debating whether the house meets the definition of a "blaze" or not. We all see the fire, we all have access to the relevant economic indicators.
With regard to the "people want the president to do something about it" interpretation, no they don't. Anything Biden uses from fiscal toolbox would draw even more complaints. The people complaining don't even have suggestions.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI think that is an amazingly cynical take. You think that people knowingly want their lives to be worse to spite Biden? If Biden could wave a magic wand and make everyone rich with no ill effects, you think people would say no? I think just about everyone wants what they think is best for their family and children.
- SantalBlush 4y agoNope, that is a non sequitur. I'm saying that any intervention applied by this administration would be met with criticism by these aforementioned people. >If Biden could wave a magic wand and make everyone rich with no ill effects, you think people would say no? That isn't how this works at all. They wouldn't say no, they would instead reject your premise that Biden could achieve it. If Biden intervened today and they got rich tomorrow or next year, they could still deny that it was his administration's doing and exclaim that (for example) it was the former administration's policies finally taking effect.