2 ms·
Oh, I actually meant to link to this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.10487.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.10487.pdf They make an argument that there might ex
by p1esk 4y ago
Oh, I actually meant to link to this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.10487.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.10487.pdf
They make an argument that there might exist an unfortunate dup/unique data ratio in a dataset, where a model decides to memorize a frequently repeated chunk of data which is big enough to justify accuracy degradation happening for the rest of the data, but not too big to make memorization difficult (section 5.1). The degradation they show is substantial - almost as if going from 800M to 400M model.