3 ms·
Interesting story of a quest to install a desalination plant. I was listening to one of the persons pushing the deal on a podcast. He had a baby at the time he
by ransom1538 4y ago
Interesting story of a quest to install a desalination plant. I was listening to one of the persons pushing the deal on a podcast. He had a baby at the time he started, his son is now about to go to college. Each time he would go to court or attempt the permitting process there was endless red tape. NIMBYs win again.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2022/05/16/california-panel-unanimously-quashes-desalination-plant https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/sta...
- sologoub 4y agoThere is another facility that is supposedly progressing better in nearby Dana Point, but given our current state of affairs the denial is borderline criminal: https://www.kcet.org/news-community/can-desalination-be-a-solution-for-drought-in-socal https://www.kcet.org/news-community/can-desalination-be-a-so... The coastal commission citing socioeconomic concerns of water rate increases is especially strange, given that their mission has nothing to do with how much and who pays for water: https://www.coastal.ca.gov/whoweare.html https://www.coastal.ca.gov/whoweare.html A much better option would have been to have the local water agencies have households opt into the water at a higher rate and not be subject to limits, e.g. up to 80% of the limit, pay $X, then 20% pay $1.5X and then pay $3X to subsidize those who cannot pay. We have progressive rate schedules on many things and they work well enough. If enough people opt in, the subsidy from those paying a lot more could even be used to reduce or eliminate costs for low income households.