8 ms·

I don't know, but 'distilled' water is typically sold as the most chemically pure form of water. I do know it needs to be remineralized or something, as pure di

by tomc1985 4y ago

I don't know, but 'distilled' water is typically sold as the most chemically pure form of water. I do know it needs to be remineralized or something, as pure distilled water is bad for you.

p1esk 4y ago
pure distilled water is bad for you No, it’s not. I’ve been drinking it exclusively for the last ~20 years and have no health issues.
- stolsvik 4y ago
  Out of curiosity: Why?
  - p1esk 4y ago
    Because after you drink distilled water, tap water and most bottled water smell and taste bad.
- cvccvroomvroom 4y ago
  Exactly. It's water. It's not bleach. If you take a multivitamin and eat a varied diet, there is no "magic" nutritional value lost. Water doesn't have to come out of a Voss water bottle or the ground to be "healthy".
  - tomc1985 4y ago
    > If you take a multivitamin and eat a varied diet, there is no "magic" nutritional value lost. So you're substituting in the lost minerals from other sources. I don't see how that detracts from my (rather weak) argument Why do you seem to feel so strongly about distilled water?
    - paledot 4y ago
      Because your statement is demonstrably false and people here are nothing if not pedantic.
      - tomc1985 4y ago
        I don't know what's so demonstrably false about it; there is credible evidence (cited in another comment) suggesting mineral/electrolyte loss from drinking demineralized water and GGP admits to purposefully consuming nutrients from other sources to compensate. That only helps to prove my point? If you have to compensate from other sources than I don't understand how something is necessarily harmless, without the qualifier that it should only be used in the context of a proper diet (which many/most don't have, particularly the types that might be susceptible to quack wellness claims) Besides, one anecdote does not a disproven theory make
        paledot 4y ago
        Something needs to do harm in order to be harmful. If I drink a bottle of distilled water a day, I am healthier (better hydrated) than if I do not drink that bottle. That is the opposite of harmful. Replacing tap water or bottled water with distilled is nominally harmful, but because you stopped drinking the mineralized water, not because you started drinking distilled. And yes, no one is saying that not drinking water is not harmful. This just seems like such a bizarre and indefensible hill to die on.
        Johnythree 4y ago
        Yes, you are correct. If you consume only distilled water, you will get sick. This of course means not eating or drinking anything else. But it should be obvious that your mineralisation is not on a knife-edge. The tiny amount of minerals lost by drinking distilled water is massively made up in the other stuff you eat and drink.
        p1esk 4y ago
        Yes, you are correct. If you consume only distilled water, you will get sick. No, this is not proven. To prove this, we must demonstrate that a person who only drinks distilled water would get sick sooner than the same person who only drinks tap water - in exactly the same conditions. Clearly this experiment would be very hard to perform. But if someone did perform it, I'd love to hear about it.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
cvccvroomvroom 4y ago
Show any scientific evidence stating this.
- tomc1985 4y ago
  Why not google this yourself? Here are a few papers I was able to dig up: http://ecoewp.com/images/nutrientschap12.pdf http://ecoewp.com/images/nutrientschap12.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223198/ And FFS people, lighten up. The preferred way to correct someone wrong on the internet is gently.
  - tekknik 4y ago
    > The preferred way to correct someone wrong on the internet is gently. Many of us have had the “citation needed” demand thrown in our face in very rude ways during the COVID vaccine debacle. It’s gonna take some years for it to settle down and be forgotten again.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
WaitWaitWha 4y ago
i think you maybe thinking deionized water?[0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purified_water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purified_water
- tomc1985 4y ago
  I'm thinking demineralized water, of which distillation is several ways to produce it. The rub seems to be that it leeches minerals from both the body and distribution mechanisms (like metal piping)
  - Johnythree 4y ago
    > The rub seems to be It isn't and doesn't. Please stop pushing this annoying myth.
    - hackerfromthefu 4y ago
      You are pushing (incorrect) anecdotes, with a hubris of certainty. Please provide quality references, or even some argument, to support your statement, beyond 'you said so'. 'You said so' is always a useless information-less way to communicate that I would push back on, but this is a health relevant issue, and you are spreading misinformation that is dangerous. Provide some quality references if you're right, but you're not.
      - 867-5309 4y ago
        >incorrect >if you're right, but you're not where is your evidence?
Johnythree 4y ago
> pure distilled water is bad for you. This is a particularly annoying myth. When the water passes through the gut it picks up plenty of mineralisation, as well as other gunge.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- upsidesinclude 4y ago
  Your point is well taken, but if you have never witnessed it in extreme I believe you are not evaluating it fairly. On ships, vacuum vapor distillation is quite common for drinking water production. This is because the equipment is used to generate boiler feed water, which must be high quality distillate. Acquiring additional water-making equipment is redundant. Nutritional content can be limited and lacking diversity. Many minerals in the body are of very low concentration, they are nevertheless, necessary. Osmosis will delpete the body of these over time. The health effects of this would require a longterm study for chronic symptoms to appear. I have never seen any study of this nature. I have seen mariners after several months at sea with no other water source and, yes anecdotally, they look like hell. I will not drink distilled water for any length of time, but a few weeks would never amount to anything. So in your day to day life, sure, you have a healthy, diverse, first-world diet and have no ill-effect from drinking distilled water. You can 'live' drinking only Coke. Appalling, certainly, but doable. In terms of cost and energy expense, distilled water is likely higher than Coke to produce, though that is an aside.
- hackerfromthefu 4y ago
  You're partially correct, but missed the important point here. As a result your advice is dangerous to health. You don't want water picking up minerals from your body .. you want it DEPOSITING minerals into your body. That's the way we evolved obtaining minerals from water from streams where the water runs over rocks to mineralise.

I don't know, but 'distilled' water is typically sold as the most chemically pure form of water. I do know it needs to be remineralized or something, as pure distilled water is bad for you.

p1esk 4y ago

pure distilled water is bad for you No, it’s not. I’ve been drinking it exclusively for the last ~20 years and have no health issues.

stolsvik 4y ago
Out of curiosity: Why?
- p1esk 4y ago
  Because after you drink distilled water, tap water and most bottled water smell and taste bad.
cvccvroomvroom 4y ago
Exactly. It's water. It's not bleach. If you take a multivitamin and eat a varied diet, there is no "magic" nutritional value lost. Water doesn't have to come out of a Voss water bottle or the ground to be "healthy".
- tomc1985 4y ago
  > If you take a multivitamin and eat a varied diet, there is no "magic" nutritional value lost. So you're substituting in the lost minerals from other sources. I don't see how that detracts from my (rather weak) argument Why do you seem to feel so strongly about distilled water?
  - paledot 4y ago
    Because your statement is demonstrably false and people here are nothing if not pedantic.
    - tomc1985 4y ago
      I don't know what's so demonstrably false about it; there is credible evidence (cited in another comment) suggesting mineral/electrolyte loss from drinking demineralized water and GGP admits to purposefully consuming nutrients from other sources to compensate. That only helps to prove my point? If you have to compensate from other sources than I don't understand how something is necessarily harmless, without the qualifier that it should only be used in the context of a proper diet (which many/most don't have, particularly the types that might be susceptible to quack wellness claims) Besides, one anecdote does not a disproven theory make
      - paledot 4y ago
        Something needs to do harm in order to be harmful. If I drink a bottle of distilled water a day, I am healthier (better hydrated) than if I do not drink that bottle. That is the opposite of harmful. Replacing tap water or bottled water with distilled is nominally harmful, but because you stopped drinking the mineralized water, not because you started drinking distilled. And yes, no one is saying that not drinking water is not harmful. This just seems like such a bizarre and indefensible hill to die on.
      - Johnythree 4y ago
        Yes, you are correct. If you consume only distilled water, you will get sick. This of course means not eating or drinking anything else. But it should be obvious that your mineralisation is not on a knife-edge. The tiny amount of minerals lost by drinking distilled water is massively made up in the other stuff you eat and drink.
        p1esk 4y ago
        Yes, you are correct. If you consume only distilled water, you will get sick. No, this is not proven. To prove this, we must demonstrate that a person who only drinks distilled water would get sick sooner than the same person who only drinks tap water - in exactly the same conditions. Clearly this experiment would be very hard to perform. But if someone did perform it, I'd love to hear about it.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

cvccvroomvroom 4y ago

Show any scientific evidence stating this.

tomc1985 4y ago
Why not google this yourself? Here are a few papers I was able to dig up: http://ecoewp.com/images/nutrientschap12.pdf http://ecoewp.com/images/nutrientschap12.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4223198/ And FFS people, lighten up. The preferred way to correct someone wrong on the internet is gently.
- tekknik 4y ago
  > The preferred way to correct someone wrong on the internet is gently. Many of us have had the “citation needed” demand thrown in our face in very rude ways during the COVID vaccine debacle. It’s gonna take some years for it to settle down and be forgotten again.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]

WaitWaitWha 4y ago

i think you maybe thinking deionized water?[0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purified_water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purified_water

tomc1985 4y ago
I'm thinking demineralized water, of which distillation is several ways to produce it. The rub seems to be that it leeches minerals from both the body and distribution mechanisms (like metal piping)
- Johnythree 4y ago
  > The rub seems to be It isn't and doesn't. Please stop pushing this annoying myth.
  - hackerfromthefu 4y ago
    You are pushing (incorrect) anecdotes, with a hubris of certainty. Please provide quality references, or even some argument, to support your statement, beyond 'you said so'. 'You said so' is always a useless information-less way to communicate that I would push back on, but this is a health relevant issue, and you are spreading misinformation that is dangerous. Provide some quality references if you're right, but you're not.
    - 867-5309 4y ago
      >incorrect >if you're right, but you're not where is your evidence?

Johnythree 4y ago

> pure distilled water is bad for you. This is a particularly annoying myth. When the water passes through the gut it picks up plenty of mineralisation, as well as other gunge.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
upsidesinclude 4y ago
Your point is well taken, but if you have never witnessed it in extreme I believe you are not evaluating it fairly. On ships, vacuum vapor distillation is quite common for drinking water production. This is because the equipment is used to generate boiler feed water, which must be high quality distillate. Acquiring additional water-making equipment is redundant. Nutritional content can be limited and lacking diversity. Many minerals in the body are of very low concentration, they are nevertheless, necessary. Osmosis will delpete the body of these over time. The health effects of this would require a longterm study for chronic symptoms to appear. I have never seen any study of this nature. I have seen mariners after several months at sea with no other water source and, yes anecdotally, they look like hell. I will not drink distilled water for any length of time, but a few weeks would never amount to anything. So in your day to day life, sure, you have a healthy, diverse, first-world diet and have no ill-effect from drinking distilled water. You can 'live' drinking only Coke. Appalling, certainly, but doable. In terms of cost and energy expense, distilled water is likely higher than Coke to produce, though that is an aside.
hackerfromthefu 4y ago
You're partially correct, but missed the important point here. As a result your advice is dangerous to health. You don't want water picking up minerals from your body .. you want it DEPOSITING minerals into your body. That's the way we evolved obtaining minerals from water from streams where the water runs over rocks to mineralise.