3 ms·
Apart from some very slow atom and particle simulations... Is not most physics based on very extreme oversimplifications? They are still very useful because e
by Shorel 4y ago
Apart from some very slow atom and particle simulations...
Is not most physics based on very extreme oversimplifications?
They are still very useful because errors average out, but for example: we don't know why fluid simulations work, in fact aerodynamics is an entire empirical field.
This was seen in F1 this year. All cars bouncing on straights, it was even given the name porpoising by the pilots. The teams never expected it, because the simulations never discovered anything about it.
Also: all the work of AlphaFold predicting protein structures.
Physics are awesome at predicting planetary motion, but stuff at smaller scales require a lot of empirical engineering to figure out.
- JPLeRouzic 4y ago> but stuff at smaller scales require a lot of empirical engineering to figure out. And that made the fortune of CAD software designers.
- mhh__ 4y agoThe porpoising is apparently because the more expensive higher speed wind tunnel analysis is banned. Engineering needs engineering,. Physics does not. The interesting thing about aero in physics is the emergence of extremely complicated phenomena, not the equations as per se.