4 ms·
As a subscriber I do "pay for more", so I see the complete analysis available after each game which has better UX and available content. You make it sound like
by mythz 4y ago
As a subscriber I do "pay for more", so I see the complete analysis available after each game which has better UX and available content.
You make it sound like chess.com shoves heaps of dark practice's IAP in your face, which isn't true, after I've paid for a subscription [1] I've seen no more paywall content or any more monetization options, I get full access to their sub content & features, which because it's great value and tastefully done, I intend to re-subscribe next year if I'm still playing by then.
[1] https://chess.com/membership https://chess.com/membership
- permo-w 4y ago>after I've paid for a subscription in lichess you can computer analyse the board as many times as you want, for free, without even needing an account. the only catch is that you might not notice the feature if you weren't looking for it. chess.com shoves it in your face, lets you do a few analyses, and then asks you to pay for more. whether that is still the case after you've already paid for more isn't really the point