I think it's interesting that "Troll" now covers a range of activity from "Mildly amusing but fake anecdotes designed to trigger a reaction" to "Sending violent

I think it's interesting that "Troll" now covers a range of activity from "Mildly amusing but fake anecdotes designed to trigger a reaction" to "Sending violent rape threats to people on the internet". It's beautiful to see the craft of some of these posts though, the repeated reference to (female), the slight stretching of the possible. But I think the funniest part is the pure lack of sense of humour in the people he's trolling - that's always the best part. If I were a part of a group like that I would far prefer to allow the trolling to continue as an in-joke rather than the ridiculous move to ban him. It's like banning a Dilbert cartoon.