6 ms·
True but "you wouldn't have chosen that job" is a very different situation from "you now have to find another". To use your analogy, if the travel was subsidis
by tpoacher 4y ago
True but "you wouldn't have chosen that job" is a very different situation from "you now have to find another".
To use your analogy, if the travel was subsidised maybe you would actually take the plane. If the plane company suddenly stops because of strikes, this affects you, not some theoretical shmuck who shouldnt be using planes.
- throwaway22032 4y agoI mean, in a basic sense, if you choose to live so far away from your job that there only exists one possible transport mechanism, then yes, you are dependent on that one transport mechanism. If e.g. a city metro ramped prices then many people in outer zones would have the choice to either pay it, move job, or cycle/walk in. If they bought a house next to a station with no other good transport links and no local work, well, it's not as if that wasn't known...