Probably, for ethical reasons. but we should worry a lot more if it achieves sapience. I'm also pretty sure that anything (sapience, sentience, whatever) requir

Probably, for ethical reasons. but we should worry a lot more if it achieves sapience. I'm also pretty sure that anything (sapience, sentience, whatever) requires closing the loop so the perceiver can perceive itself perceiving, though the idea that I am merely a single Boltzmannesque forward-pass of a language model will certainly run in the back of my head as I'm trying to drift off to sleep tonight.