3 ms·
If this is the case, why not go to the source of the data? (I think it’s because the source of the data is not guaranteed to be free but hitting Zillow’s public
by grepfru_it 4y ago
If this is the case, why not go to the source of the data? (I think it’s because the source of the data is not guaranteed to be free but hitting Zillow’s public infra is)
- tndibona 4y agoThe problem is the source isn’t one place. The source is a collection of 500 MLSes across North America. They have a vested interest in keeping the data accessible only for licensed realtors. Striking a conversation with 500 MLSes would be a big undertaking, I would need contacts and connections in the real estate world.
- jpmattia 4y agoMight be worth noting: There is a DOJ antitrust lawsuit against NAR over MLS practices, though I don't know if your use-case is part of that. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-files-antitrust-case-and-simultaneous-settlement-requiring-national https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-files-anti...
- grepfru_it 4y agoHmm the source Zillow and other realtor company’s get their data from are local governments. They all offer tax, ownership info, last sale price etc. they all also charge differing amounts from free (if you walk into their records office) to cost per dataset to as costly as cost per data request. Then there’s the sheer number of locales you must query for this info, typically on a per county basis. So you head to a data broker who has collected all of this information but they charge for their time and efforts which is $&$$. So that’s why I mentioned Zillow’s public servers are cheaper Contacts and connections are easy. Money is harder :)