The strings are: use this money to invest in production. That doesn't seem like much of a string. If that string is too much, would a better law be "give money

The strings are: use this money to invest in production. That doesn't seem like much of a string. If that string is too much, would a better law be "give money to executives and stockholders of semiconductor companies and ask the semiconductor companies to invest money that they're claiming they don't have"? If you disagree with that interpretation of what you're saying, I'd like you to explain how prohibiting then from simply taking the money and forwarding it to execs and stockholders is a problem?