> Income is related to consumption, and consumption is related to emissions and pollution. This doesn't make any sense. The suggestion is to make more money an

> Income is related to consumption, and consumption is related to emissions and pollution. This doesn't make any sense. The suggestion is to make more money and donate ~all of it instead of consuming it. You can't look at a plan to make more income and infer that the higher income means more consumption _when the entire point of the plan explicitly avoids consuming the excess income_.