> it seems like he was enabling scammers while not taking any personnal money from anyone. "X didn't scam anyone, X just sold a template that allowed others to

> it seems like he was enabling scammers while not taking any personnal money from anyone. "X didn't scam anyone, X just sold a template that allowed others to scam". If there's no reasonable other legitimate purpose, then it's still profiting from scamming, albeit at one layer of abstraction. > Would his company be targeted by the US gov? If it turns out that he was enabling scammers to scam, then yeah - I would hope so.