3 ms·
The article said it was around 1000 employees. So cutting his pay by $50m would mean $50k per laid-off employee. How as an investor or shareholder can you not
by nerdponx 4y ago
The article said it was around 1000 employees. So cutting his pay by $50m would mean $50k per laid-off employee.
How as an investor or shareholder can you not look at this as downright robbery?
- Keegs 4y agoBut the same $50m paid to a single employee (on top of hundreds more) is not robbery?
- nerdponx 4y agoI might have been too obtuse with my post. I meant that it's robbery for the CEO to be compensated so much.
- spywaregorilla 4y agoThat would be his money, not the shareholders