3 ms·
Not sure why AlgorithmicTime's comment is dead, so I'll reply here. Long distances are probably tricky to electrify. I don't know enough about US railroads (wha
by elric 4y ago
Not sure why AlgorithmicTime's comment is dead, so I'll reply here. Long distances are probably tricky to electrify. I don't know enough about US railroads (what little I know of US railroads comes from playing Ticket To Ride) to comment on the feasibility, but there are very long electrified railways in China and Japan, across difficult terrain. There is probably not much benefit in feeding electricity from regenerative braking back onto the overhead line if it's a very long segment with only one train (no one to use the power + transmission losses).
I wonder at which point diesel becomes the cleaner option here, if ever. One the one hand, you have to lug a lot of fuel around over longer distances (or you need refueling infrastructure). On the other hand, transmission losses can be significant.
- lstodd 4y agoWell, you up the voltage and go AC, losses then become manageable. The move from 1.5KV DC to 25KV AC in Europe was about that exactly (many caveats apply, but it's basically that, a solved problem). If it's a somewhat loaded segment, someone would be there to consume the regenerated power. If it's not loaded then yes, no point in electrifying it to begin with.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]