5 ms·

If you needed to play so much with words, then it will eventually become a specialized task killing any benefit of having the AI doing the work for you since we

If you needed to play so much with words, then it will eventually become a specialized task killing any benefit of having the AI doing the work for you since we eventually we will need to resort to specialists to use the AI to get the result we expect. On the bright side the result may be better, it may be easier to become and "AI usage specialist" than specializing in many different areas, the result may include many intermediate results that a specialist would find too much work to do and, with a bit a patience (like in the presented case), the task can still be done without the need of an "AI usage specialist". Currently, I think the problem is an UI one. There should be an option to allow the user to do something like: "from the last drawing, just add this..." or "in the last drawing, change the color/size/style of this and that...". This would be probably enough to achieve what the author wanted in a much smaller number of iterations. There is also on more thing: the costumer doesn't know exactly what he/she wants from the beginning. So, it is normal to have a few iterations until something pleasing is achieved.

kriro 4y ago
The process can be optimized with more AI :D Create a logo generator site, allow users to pick something very limited like industry/field from a dropdown or something, generate say 9 logos with AI generated text discriptions that fit this selection and remember which one the user picked and use that data to build a network that generates good text descriptions to feed into DALL-E 2 based on a singe item selected by the user.
xsmasher 4y ago
> If you needed to play so much with words, then it will eventually become a specialized task killing any benefit of having the AI doing the work for you since we eventually we will need to resort to specialists to use the AI to get the result we expect. This matches my view of the idea that AI will replace programmers. My value isn't in the typing and the syntax, it's in my ability to turn a spec into an internally consistent design by resolving conflicting instructions and clarifying edge cases; and sometimes in knowing what the user wants when they are unable to express it themselves. Even if AI winds up writing all of the code, someone with the programmer mindset still needs to define the problem in a concrete manner. They'll always have a job as a "machine-talker."

kriro 4y ago

The process can be optimized with more AI :D Create a logo generator site, allow users to pick something very limited like industry/field from a dropdown or something, generate say 9 logos with AI generated text discriptions that fit this selection and remember which one the user picked and use that data to build a network that generates good text descriptions to feed into DALL-E 2 based on a singe item selected by the user.

xsmasher 4y ago

> If you needed to play so much with words, then it will eventually become a specialized task killing any benefit of having the AI doing the work for you since we eventually we will need to resort to specialists to use the AI to get the result we expect. This matches my view of the idea that AI will replace programmers. My value isn't in the typing and the syntax, it's in my ability to turn a spec into an internally consistent design by resolving conflicting instructions and clarifying edge cases; and sometimes in knowing what the user wants when they are unable to express it themselves. Even if AI winds up writing all of the code, someone with the programmer mindset still needs to define the problem in a concrete manner. They'll always have a job as a "machine-talker."