3 ms·
I guess - I would also guess that one not getting promoted might also be related to the lack skills at leadership, etc. Given his thoughts on leadership: We
by clutchdude 4y ago
I guess - I would also guess that one not getting promoted might also be related to the lack skills at leadership, etc.
Given his thoughts on leadership:
Well, my theory is that all leadership is a form of evil, because the whole point of managing people is getting them to do stuff they don’t want to do on their own. You don’t need a manager to tell people to eat chocolate chip cookies, because they want to do that. But you do need a manager to tell them to work extra hours for the same amount of pay, and I’m not good at that. If managing were truly a case of win-win scenarios – you give me more and you get more out – I could definitely do that. But the “best” managers are not like that, [according to real-world corporate behaviour]. The “best” ones are the ones getting you to do stuff and giving you nothing in return.
I can see that he might not be promoted due to skill and ability.
- leereeves 4y agoIf that were the reason, then why would his boss tell him it was about race?
- random314 4y agoDiscriminating on the basis of color and gender is illegal and managers are explicitly trained to not make such statements. I have a hard time believing such a conversation happened.
- clutchdude 4y agoCorrection: Why would Scott Adams say that his boss told him it was about race? That is the assumption of this discussion. To me, we're beyond whether his race was a factor in promotion - he by direct provided self description is probably not a good candidate. But I'll guess beyond that. Maybe his boss wanted to keep him in his current position but needed a scapegoat to blame as a factor beyond both their control. Keep in mind this would have been more acceptable to suggest in 1970s/1980s than 2022. Maybe Scott Adams is making this all up or taking a partial comment and constructing his own flawed narrative around it, or, in the very least, neglecting key context to fully understand it. Again, I don't know what you want me to say here. I never brought up the origination of Dilbert nor understand where you are driving this discussion to.