4 ms·
Somebody who directly invested the majority of their money in an experimental bridge protocol that raised its seed round 3 months ago is by definition not a nor
by dcolkitt 4y ago
Somebody who directly invested the majority of their money in an experimental bridge protocol that raised its seed round 3 months ago is by definition not a normie.
- function_seven 4y agoWhich reinforces the top of this thread: "Reason #5734 why cryptocurrency is a non starter for real people."
- obilgic 4y agoHowever cryptocurrency != "an experimental bridge protocol that raised its seed round 3 months ago"
- hn_throwaway_99 4y agoThe main point still stands. The crypto world sees "the code is the law" and non-repudiable/non-reversible transactions as a feature. The rest of the world (correctly in my view) sees it as a bug.
- woojoo666 4y agoThat "main point" was never justified here. Commenters just assumed that a hack on an experimental bridge protocol reflected on crypto as a whole
- ohgodplsno 4y agoNo wall street banker was running around telling everyone how awesome MBSes are. However, morons spamming TikTok, Twitter, Facebook and every social network to find a sucker to invest in their super 20% profit moon monkey future currency can be found in a minute, reaching hundreds of thousands. Plenty of normies lose their money in this.