3 ms·
You're actually allowed to have skepticism about someone else's personal claims, offered decades after the fact, without any corroborating external facts.
by lamontcg 4y ago
You're actually allowed to have skepticism about someone else's personal claims, offered decades after the fact, without any corroborating external facts.
- leereeves 4y agoWhat's the basis of your skepticism here? Is it rooted in fact, or in bias?
- random314 4y agoIts rooted in the fact that this behavior is illegal and managers are explicitly trained to not make any such communication.
- hnfong 4y agoBy your reasoning everyone who reports a crime should be presumed to be lying.
- giaour 4y agoWe do in fact require more than a report before meting out punishments. Whether that means "everyone who reports a crime should be presumed to be lying" or "everyone accused of a crime should be presumed to be innocent" is a matter of how you want to spin it.
- hnfong 4y agoThere's a material difference between a public, open forum and a court that can mete out punishments. Though people tend to confuse the two these days.