4 ms·
> Evidence would be interesting, but unsupported accusations don't add anything to the conversation. Seeing as how Adams has no evidence whatsoever that a larg
by evgen 4y ago
> Evidence would be interesting, but unsupported accusations don't add anything to the conversation.
Seeing as how Adams has no evidence whatsoever that a large corporation whose HR department would be well-versed in what they can and cannot say (as well as what they should and should not say) to employees I think the burden of proof rests on Adams.
- leereeves 4y agoPresumably an HR department or executive would also be smart enough not to put such a statement in writing.