4 ms·
> Is there any consensus on an eventual copyright of such works? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-office-rules-ai-art-cant-be-copyrighted
by flaviut 4y ago
> Is there any consensus on an eventual copyright of such works?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-office-rules-ai-art-cant-be-copyrighted-180979808/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-offic...
- naillo 4y agoThis is kind of a weird take to me given that photoshop exists. (Tons of proto-computer vision algorithms in there, like basic convolutional filters.) I suspect you'd still get copyright if you modify it a bit somehow.
- zucked 4y agoSo, if a nascent company chooses to go down this same path of generating (or maybe _seeding_) their logo design with AI, have they essentially given up any ability to protect that logo going forward?
- singlow 4y agoLogo's are generally protected by trademark rather than copyright. I don't think anything prevents you from using a generated logo with trademark. For example you could have a trademark on an orange square, even though you could never copyright it. In the same way a trademark could protect your product name even if it is a single English common noun, as long as it is distinctive in use within your trademark scope.