3 ms·
I'm not a lawyer, but Visa stopped doing business with PH in 2020 when a report came out that showed the moderation issues with PH. [0] I'm guessing that the la
by Miner49er 4y ago
I'm not a lawyer, but Visa stopped doing business with PH in 2020 when a report came out that showed the moderation issues with PH. [0] I'm guessing that the lawyer for this case decided to go after Visa because of this. It can be used as evidence that even Visa themselves agrees they shouldn't have been doing business with PH.
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/10/22168240/mastercard-ending-pornhub-payment-processing-unlawful-videos https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/10/22168240/mastercard-endi...
- nerdjon 4y agoI am not a lawyer either. But I would think to win sueing someone you have to show intent. If visa cut off ties when new evidence was presented I would think that would show a lack of intent?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- s1artibartfast 4y agoYou often dont have to show intent.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> But I would think to win sueing someone you have to show intent. In this case the plaintiff has to show knowledge, but showing is a later stage of the case. The decision here was only over whether a valid claim was stated.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> It can be used as evidence that even Visa themselves agrees they shouldn't have been doing business with PH. Specifically cited in the decision (along with Pornhub purging of the vast majority of it's content in direct response to that suspension) as showing that Visa had the power to affect Pornhub content (since Visa had apparently argued that lack of such power as a reason they should not be liable even if they had knowledge.)