4 ms·
The thing I am still missing is a zero-weight alternative to Github/lab. Most of the task performed on either of them could be done in a completely distributed
by grumbel 4y ago
The thing I am still missing is a zero-weight alternative to Github/lab. Most of the task performed on either of them could be done in a completely distributed fashion (issue tracking, CI, etc.), just like git itself. But there has been frustratingly little development in that area, though a few projects exists (e.g. "git-bug", "act").
- bkq 4y agoYou mention CI being done in a distributed fashion. Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? I'm asking as I'm someone who has developed a CI platform [1], and one of its features is the offline runner [2]. The offline runner allows you to run your CI builds on your own computer, and does not communicate with the CI server whatsoever. Is this what you had in mind? [1] https://about.djinn-ci.com https://about.djinn-ci.com [2] https://docs.djinn-ci.com/user/offline-runner/ https://docs.djinn-ci.com/user/offline-runner/
- spockz 4y agoI know about Google’s gerrit. I now found https://github.com/google/git-appraise https://github.com/google/git-appraise, there seems to be a plethora on the issue and pr tracking side. Then the other day there was a generic/abstraction layer to write CI that abstracte over gitlab, circle ci, and GitHub actions (maybe more). I suppose all that’s left is to get some api tokens somewhere and go?
- yoavm 4y agoSourceHut? https://sourcehut.org/ https://sourcehut.org/
- iveqy 4y agothere's git appraise, however I find it a bit immature. I try to use it with a rebase workflow instead of a merge workflow and it completely fails with that.
- CGamesPlay 4y agoFossil advertises this as a main selling point: https://fossil-scm.org/home https://fossil-scm.org/home
- selfhoster11 4y agoSure, but Git is the standard.