There's an important distinction to be made between helping to make it work (e.g. explaining how the bootloader is implemented, or perhaps offering occasional c

There's an important distinction to be made between helping to make it work (e.g. explaining how the bootloader is implemented, or perhaps offering occasional code bug fixes) and directly revealing Apple intellectual property by supplying internal documentation or code written with the knowledge of internal documentation. I'm sure there are people at Apple itching to provide documentation for things like the GPU. But given the minefield which is GPU patents I honestly don't blame Apple for deciding there's insufficient upside to revealing anything they don't have to.