3 ms·
I highly disagree. Peter Watts has lots of explanatory segments, but he uses them for building his world and characters, not for teaching you stuff you can alr
by shkkmo 4y ago
I highly disagree.
Peter Watts has lots of explanatory segments, but he uses them for building his world and characters, not for teaching you stuff you can already go learn about in this world.
I'm sorry you don't enjoy his work, but I really like his writing style and have read Blindsight multiple times.
- Verdex 4y agoI agree with you, but at the same time. Like, you have to admit that Blindsight is not going to be a book for everyone. I think the book is fantastic. I've read it at least three times, and I expect that I'm going to read it at least a few more times. However, I'm not showing it to anyone who hasn't already displayed an appetite for hard scifi.
- shkkmo 4y agoI recommend Blindsight frequently. It isn't for everyone, but I think there are a wide variety of types of people who would enjoy it, including those who tend to read more non-fiction than fiction. In my opinion, the payoff from that book is high enough that it is worth recommending it to a few people who won't like it. I also think that people too frequently don't try things because they or someone else thinks they won't like it. I'm a big fan of people pushing their comfort zone and trying new things.
- AlwaysRock 4y agoI loved his work. It's a slog to get through. Both those things can be true. It's not the explanatory segments. It's his entire writing style.