With the caveat that I'm just an internet commentator that doesn't know what I'm talking about. > Sometimes after deep thought, you may decide one of them is a

With the caveat that I'm just an internet commentator that doesn't know what I'm talking about. > Sometimes after deep thought, you may decide one of them is actually better, but not by very much. I feel like the value here is simply not for the decision at hand. It's that you learn something for future decisions. When the options are very close, there's not much value to be gained for this decision, but it indicates there is something new to learn. When the options are obviously far apart, there's nothing to learn. I've thought about this on and off in the context of poker. When you're playing 24 tables at the same time you simply can't waste focus in the moment on the close calls unless the pot is big. Instead, analyze the things you think are close calls offline.