2 ms·
it isn't really. Eastern bloc housing looks butt ugly but it was cheap and equitable. Singapore's just richer and probably hired an interior designer. The probl
by Barrin92 4y ago
it isn't really. Eastern bloc housing looks butt ugly but it was cheap and equitable. Singapore's just richer and probably hired an interior designer. The problems start when you try to centrally manage every box of cornflakes you make, not national infrastructure.
I'll go one further and tell you there is no such thing as free market housing and never has been, just like there's no free market submarine or free market interstate highway. These are big governmental and corporate projects and at best the market shuffles the occupants around after the fact. Every project like that is communist even in the good old US of A, just don't run the entire country that way and you're golden.
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoSo your argument is, not that Eastern bloc housing was good, but that it was good enough to be far better than homelessness? That's... probably true. Given the choice, I'd probably take a Warsaw Pact apartment over a cardboard box. [Edit: There are submarines that are free market, and are for sale to (wealthy) private individuals. There are also free market interstate highways; they are toll roads. Still official interstate highways, but privately owned and operated.]